Анатомо-функциональные особенности тазового дна у женщин в различные возрастные периоды

1. Гилядова А.В., Ищенко А.А., Решетов И.В., Ищенко А.И., Аполихина И.А., Саидова А.С., Пучкова Е.Н., Петровичев В.С., Мершина Е.А., Новрузалиева М.Ф. Роль динамической магнитно-резонансной томографии в диагностике пролапса тазовых органов. Акушерство и гинекология. 2023; 4: 28-39.
2. Wang B., Chen Y., Zhu X., Wang T., Li M., Huang Y. et al. Global burden and trends of pelvic organ prolapse associated with aging women: An observational trend study from 1990 to 2019. Front. Public Health. 2022; 10: 975829. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.975829
3. Yuk J.S., Lee J.H., Hur J.Y., Shin J.H. The prevalence and treatment pattern of clinically diagnosed pelvic organ prolapse: a Korean National Health Insurance Database-based cross-sectional study 2009-2015. Sci. Rep. 2018; 8(1): 1334. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19692-5
4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society; INTERIM UPDATE: This Practice Bulletin is updated as highlighted to reflect the US Food and Drug Administration order to stop the sale of transvaginal synthetic mesh products for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2019; 25(6): 397-408. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000794
5. Hadizadeh-Talasaz Z., Khadivzadeh T., Mohajeri T., Sadeghi M. Worldwide prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran. J. Public. Health. 2024; 53(3): 524-38. https://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i3.15134
6. Безменко А.А., Берлев И.В., Скворцов В.Г. Опыт использования синтетических сетчатых имплантов для коррекции пролапса гениталий. Военно-медицинский журнал. 2012; 333(8): 35-7.
7. Эйзенах И.А., Власова В.В., Мозес В.Г., Захаров И.С. Ранние mesh-ассоциированные послеоперационные осложнения при установке синтетических сетчатых имплантов с двумя и четырьмя рукавами у женщин с пролапсом гениталий. Медицина в Кузбассе. 2017; 16(1): 61-4.
8. DaSilva K.A., Lee D.H., Sterling E.K., Hong A.H., Rahman S., Carter-Brooks C.M. Younger age is associated with pelvic floor muscle dysfunction in women with urinary symptoms. Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Oct 18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001557
9. Campos N.C., de Carvalho G.M., de Santos R.A., de Brito Oliveira R.D., de Oliveira Sunemi M.M., Figueiredo E.M. Prevalence, bother, and risk factors associated with occurrence of pelvic floor dysfunctions in young women: a cross-sectional survey. Journal of Women's & Pelvic Health Physical Therapy. 2024; 48(3): 194-201. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jwh.0000000000000305
10. Zhang S., Li B., Liu J., Yang L., Li H., Hong L. The causal effect of reproductive factors on pelvic floor dysfunction: a Mendelian randomization study. BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1): 74. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-02914-6
11. DeLancey J.O., Mastrovito S., Masteling M., Horner W., Ashton-Miller J.A., Chen L. A unified pelvic floor conceptual model for studying morphological changes with prolapse, age, and parity. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2024; 230(5): 476-484.e2. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1247
12. Gao Y., Luo X. Sonographic study on structural and functional impacts on female pelvic floor upon pregnancy, vaginal delivery and elective cesarean delivery. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics (Electronic Edition). 2011; 07(01): 30-3. https://dx.doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2011.01.008
13. Haylen B.T., de Ridder D., Freeman R.M., Swift S.E., Berghmans B., Lee J. et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2010; 21: 5-26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0976-9
14. Чечнева М.А., Буянова С.Н., Попов А.А., Краснопольская И.В. Ультразвуковая диагностика пролапса гениталий и недержания мочи у женщин. М.: МЕДпресс-информ; 2016. 136c.
15. Laycock J., Jerwood D. Pelvic floor muscle assessment: The PERFECT Scheme. Physiotherapy. 2001; 87(12): 631-42. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9406(05)61108-x
16. Asfour V., Digesu G.A., Fernando R., Khullar V. Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: a useful clinical tool. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2020; 31(6): 1197-202. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04166-7
17. Zhou M., Shui W., Bai W., Wu X., Ying T. Ultrasonographic study of female perineal body and its supportive function on pelvic floor. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 2023; 10: 1176360. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1176360.
18. Al-Saadi W.I. Transperineal ultrasonography in stress urinary incontinence: The significance of urethral rotation angles. Arab J. Urol. 2016; 14(1): 66-71. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2015.11.003.
19. Turkoglu A., Erturk Coskun A.D., Arinkan S.A., Vural F. The role of transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence cases. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2022; 48(1): 70-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1100
20. Naranjo-Ortiz C., Shek K.L., Martin AJ., Dietz H.P. What is normal bladder neck anatomy? Int. Urogynecol. J. 2016; 27(6): 945-50. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2916-1
21. Hajebrahimi S., Azaripour A., Sadeghi-Bazargani H. Clinical and transperineal ultrasound findings in females with stress urinary incontinence versus normal controls. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2009; 12(21): 1434-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2009.1434.1437
22. Dietz H.P. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part I: two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 23(1): 80-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.939

Поступила 11.04.2025

Принята в печать 28.05.2025